IMPORTANT ITEMS IN THIS ISSUE: Mhg#18
THE EUROPEAN UNION - NOW 25
ISRAEL AND THE WITHDRAWAL FROM GAZA
ISRAEL’S NUCLEAR DETERRENT
SHARON’S GAZA DISENGAGEMENT PLAN
PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY IGNORES U.S. WARNING
BUSH ENDORSES SHARON’S WITHDRAWAL PLAN
SHARON LOSES referendum
SHOCKING RETALIATION ATTACK
SHARON WILL PUSH AHEAD
THE QUARTET URGES WITHDRAWAL
ARABS OPPOSED TO UNILATERAL WITHDRAWAL
ISRAELIS MAY SOON HAVE A FULL-FLEDGED
PALESTINIAN TERROR STATE ON THEIR BORDER
AFRICA
SUDAN SLAVE ‘CRUCIFIED’
“CHILUBA DIDN’T MAKE ZAMBIA A CHRISTIAN NATION”
THE EUROPEAN UNION -
NOW 25
MAY 1, 04. With joyful
celebrations, the EU has welcomed ten new nations to its ranks as full
members, eight of them from the former communist bloc. In doing so, it
has buried the unhappy and artificial division that defined the Cold War
for nearly half a century. The new members are …
MAY 1, 04. With
joyful celebrations, the EU has welcomed ten new nations to its ranks as
full members, eight of them from the former communist bloc. In doing so,
it has buried the unhappy and artificial division that defined the Cold
War for nearly half a century. The new members are …
POLAND
HUNGARY
THE CZECH
REPUBLIC
SLOVAKIA,
the former Yugoslav
republic of SLOVENIA,
the former Soviet
republics of
LITHUANIA,
LATVIA
and
ESTONIA,
and the Mediterranean
islands of
Greek
CYPRUS
and MALTA.
The United Nations
was striving to reunite the two parts of Cyprus before May 1st, so that
the whole island would enter the European Union. (The deal to admit
Cyprus into the EU has been negotiated with the Greek part of the island
only.)
A referendum on 24th
April asked both the northern Turkish Cypriots, and the Greek Cypriots
in the south, to vote for or against reunification. 65% of the Turks
voted for, while 75% of Greeks voted against. So for now, the island
remains divided, and only Greek Cyprus has entered the EU.
With the 10 new
nations, the EU’s population increased from 378 million to 453 million,
to become the world’s third largest entity after China and India.
The enlarged Europe
stretches from the arctic forests of Finland, to sunny Malta in the
Mediterranean, from quaint Killarney in western Ireland to the far-flung
frontiers of Russia.
It is too early to
call the EU a “single nation.” It is a confederation, in which the
individual nations are mostly unwilling to give up their national
sovereignty in such vital areas as foreign policy and defence.
The new members do
not have a lot, economically, to bring to the Union, as all of them are
significantly poorer than the 15 older members. The new members add only
5% to the gross domestic product of the EU – equivalent to that of the
Netherlands. Compared to Germany and France, which dominate Europe, they
are all economic midgets.
But in the long term,
these weaker and poorer nations will not remain so. At present, the
former communist countries of Eastern Europe are, in fact, the only part
of the continent that is showing the potential for rapid economic
growth. With the aid of the European Union, these new democracies are
already making a determined effort to catch up with Western Europe.
FURTHER EXPANSION?
How many more nations
could be added to the EU? Well, in 2007, Bulgaria and Romania are
scheduled to join the Union.
(P.S.
Jan 07. Bulgaria and Romania have become members. So now there are 27
members. See MHG#29 January 2007)
Other aspirants are
Turkey and Israel, and then possibly Macedonia, Serbia, Montenegro,
Croatia, Bosnia, Kosovo, and Albania.
But as the number of
nations increase, so does the problems of the multi-lingual,
multi-cultural Union. The reviving Roman Empire in Europe is very much
a mixture of iron and clay. (Daniel 2:41)
It will now take
enormous strength to weld so many diverse people into a harmonious
unity. Or I should say, it will take a superman to hold the Union
together.
I am reminded of the
words of Dr Henri Spaack, one of the early planners of the European
Common Market, and Secretary-General of NATO. Years ago Spaack said;
“We
do not want another committee. What we want is a man of sufficient
stature to hold the allegiance of all people, and to lift us out of the
economic morass into which we are sinking. Send us such a man, and be he
God or devil, we will receive him.”
Europe has evolved
from the original six in 1957 to 27 nations IN 2007, and although it has
made powerful strides towards gaining superpower status, the “man of
sufficient stature” has not yet arrived.
reaching towards its destiny
THE European Union is
not yet the prophesied kingdom of the beast, but it
is
racing towards that
destiny. It will ultimately become - peaceably or by upheaval - the
seventh head of the 7-headed beast of Revelation 17.
“The beast that you
saw was, and is no more, and is about to come up out of the abyss
(the bottomless pit) and to go to destruction. And those who dwell
on the earth will wonder, whose names have not been written in the Book
of Life from the foundation of the world, when they see the beast, that
he was and is no more, and yet is to come.”
(Revelation 17:8)
The prophesied
“beast” is a confederation of nations that has its origins in the
ancient Roman Empire and the “Holy Roman Empire.” The old Roman Empire
(the 6th head) disintegrated long ago, but Daniel, and Revelation,
indicate that that iron kingdom would be revived in the endtimes to
become the 7th head. And at that time a powerful ruler – a king – would
arise.
“And in the latter
period of their rule, when the transgressors have run their course, a
king will arise, insolent and skilled in intrigue. He will become very
strong, but not by his own power. He will destroy to an extraordinary
degree and prosper and perform his will.
“He will destroy
mighty men, and also the holy people, and through his shrewdness, he
will cause deceit to succeed under his hand; and he will magnify himself
in his heart. He will destroy many while they feel secure and are at
ease. He will even rise against the Prince of princes. But he will be
broken without human agency.”
(Daniel 8:23-26)
After the Antichrist
is revealed, there will be an upheaval that will bring ten of the most
powerful EU nations under his total sovereignty. Daniel 7:20 speaks of
three horns (nations) that fell. This indicates an upheaval, but we are
not given more details about it. What is clear, though, is that there
will be ten horns on the beast – on the seventh head of the Beast – the
endtime Roman Confederation.
“The
ten horns you saw are
ten kings who have not yet received a
kingdom, but who for one hour will receive
authority as kings along with the beast. They will have one
purpose and will give their power and authority to the beast.”
(Revelation 17:12-13)
Just how the European
Union evolves into the endtime Roman Confederation remains to be seen.
The EU could be torn apart, or it could even become a two-tier
structure, with a basic core of ten nations.
In the meantime it is
interesting to see the struggles going on in the European Union.
EU CONSTITUTION IN DOUBT
THE main problem
facing the EU at present is the ratification of the newly-framed
constitution.
Several nations, last
year, blocked the ratification of the constitution, claiming it was
weighed against the smaller nations. And now, since Tony Blair, and
seven other governments have decided to put the constitution to a
referendum, the danger is that it may not be ratified at all.
When and if it is
ratified, the constitution would establish a long term president, as
well as a foreign minister for the whole Union; and this would introduce
greater federal control.
The British will
almost certainly vote ‘No’ because they fear their freedom, national
sovereignty, and limited government will be threatened. They are
apprehensive that EU sovereignty will be extended into many new areas
including defence and criminal law. The British believe there are
already enough regulations, and they do not believe it is in their
interests to give Europe powers to make more.
The British vote will
be decisive for all of Europe, but the referendum could be delayed for
as long as three years. The constitution issue is different to that of
the euro which allowed for some countries to not adopt it if they so
wished. All 25 nations need to ratify the constitution for it to come
into effect.
What we see in Europe
is a beast, seeking to give birth to the Beast kingdom of Revelation 13
& 17.
r r
r r
r
ISRAEL
AND GAZA
ISRAEL’S NUCLEAR DETERRENT
ARIEL Sharon came
close to ending Israel’s secrecy about the country’s nuclear-arms
capability, saying the US recognizes that Israel needs a credible
deterrent to Iran and other hostile countries.
“They (the US)
understand that Israel’s existence is still in danger,” Sharon said.
“Iran represents an existential threat, one of the existential threats
or maybe the main existential threat. But the recognition of Israel’s
right - and of the importance of Israel’s ability - to defend itself, by
itself, these things are clearly understood.”
Since acquiring a
nuclear reactor from France in the 1960s, Israel has maintained a policy
of “ambiguity,” refusing to confirm or deny that it has nuclear weapons.
But based on information whistleblower Mordechai Vanunu gave in a 1986
newspaper interview, experts concluded that Israel has the sixth-largest
arsenal in the world.
– Jerusalem /A.P./ Apr 24, 04
SHARON’S GAZA DISENGAGEMENT PLAN
APRIL 29. The
Israeli Prime Minister announced, “The Road Map is dead,” and
therefore he had decided to implement his own measures.
“I
would have preferred to negotiate an agreement, but several months ago I
realised it is not possible to move the road map forward because the
Palestinians do not respect their commitments.”
With the Oslo Accord,
and the Road Map, in tatters, and with no expectation of peace with the
Palestinians for at least 20 years, Ariel Sharon’s plan is to uproot the
hard-to-defend Jewish settlements with their 7,500 Israelis in the Gaza
area, to remove Israeli troops from the Gaza Strip, and to abandon the
entire Gaza to the Palestinian Arabs – all in the coming year.
Only a single
military patrol road would remain along Gaza’s border with Egypt, in
order to prevent weapons smuggling into the area.
Sharon has said
Israel would reap security benefits by leaving
its Gaza enclaves.
Under the same plan
Israel will dismantle four small isolated settlements in the West Bank,
but would strengthen the major settlements in the West Bank and
incorporate them into Israel.
The Palestinians
claim the Israeli plan is an attempt to redraw the borders. Gaza is home
to about 1.4 million Palestinians.
PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY IGNORES U.S. WARNING
THE US State
Department had warned the PA not to pursue partnership with groups,
particularly Hamas, which it said should be “ostracized and stripped of
power.”
Saeb Erekat, a
minister with the Palestinian Authority, accused the US of trying to
interfere in Palestinian affairs with its warning about Hamas.
PA Chairman Yasser
Arafat expressed support for the inclusion of the militant organization
in the Palestinian leadership.
-
Ramallah, West Bank / UPI /7 April 04
THE three largest
terror groups in Gaza met early April to discuss forming a united
leadership for the Gaza Strip.
Hamas, which is
believed to enjoy the support of the majority of Gaza Arabs, has
welcomed the idea of being a part of the PA. Its leadership made it
clear, however, that the group would not be restricted to a merely
symbolic role, but wanted partnership “along new guidelines which take
into account the weight of the various movements.”
The smaller but
equally violent Palestine Islamic Jihad (PIJ), as well as the PLO’s
Fatah faction, appear to have opted to work together with Hamas, rather
than wage a bloody war for control of Gaza.
All three
organizations have declared that Israel’s withdrawal will be a victory
for the “Palestinians” and will vindicate their 3 ½ year terror war
against the Jews.
But the battle will
be far from over!
Both Hamas and the
Palestine Islamic Jihad (PIJ) have sworn that, after Israel leaves the
Strip, they will continue their violent efforts to drive the Jews out of
all the land of Israel.
The PLO remains
committed to its 1974 Phased Plan, which commits itself to using any
part of the land over which it gains control as an attack base from
which to “liberate” the rest of “Palestine.”
After Israel’s
withdrawal, it is expected that the Palestinians will declare
independence in Gaza, and then continue their battle for the West Bank
from that beachhead.
“Disengagement” means
Gaza first. The next stage will be a disengagement from the West Bank
Palestinians. Thus the urgency to complete the Security Wall which will
also serve, at least temporarily, as an imposed boundary.
By the way, “the
wall” is more of a fence than a wall. We have seen pictures of the 10
metre high concrete wall, but actually only 20 km of the eventual 720 km
fence is concrete. The rest is a chain link (wire) fence with a dirt
road on both sides to check for footprints, and electronic sensors to
detect infiltration.
Gaza already has such
a defence fence around it.
If, following the
Gaza withdrawal, the Arabs in the Strip continue waging their terror war
against the Jewish State, (as no doubt they will), Israel will consider
cutting off all water and power supplies to them. That measure, of
course, would ensure constant conflict.
But Sharon has warned
that Israel’s response to continued Palestinian violence after the plan
was put into effect, would be harsher than the current military
operations.
Some observers
believe that behind Sharon’s disengagement idea is the fact that Israel,
as the “occupying power” of “Palestinian lands” is obligated to be
restrained in its response to the intifada. But after a Palestinian
state comes into being, it will be a different ball game. If, as a
sovereign state, the Palestinians continue to attack, Israel will have
the right to declare war, and hammer them as an enemy state.
BUSH ENDORSES SHARON’S WITHDRAWAL PLAN
IN a letter to
President Bush, Ariel Sharon said full implementation of the road map,
which charts reciprocal steps toward the creation of a Palestinian state
by 2005, “represents the sole means to make genuine progress.” But,
Sharon said to Bush: “As you have stated, a Palestinian state will never
be created by terror, and Palestinian Authority must engage in a
sustained fight against the terrorists and dismantle their
infrastructure.”
In mid-April Ariel
Sharon visited Washington, seeking support for his unilateral Gaza
“disengagement” plan, as well as his plan for Israel to permanently hold
onto the majority of the settlements with around 230,000 Jewish
settlers, in the West Bank. He came away with the endorsement he needed.
President Bush not
only endorsed Sharon’s unilateral Gaza pullout plan, but, taking note of
what he called “new realities,” he broke with decades of US policy by
also agreeing that Israel should keep parts of the West Bank in any
future peace. And to upset the Palestinians even further, he denied
Palestinian refugees the right of return to territory that is now
Israel.
In a surprise
statement, British PM Tony Blair joined Mr Bush in endorsing Israel’s
claim to a disputed portion of the West Bank, saying it was “not a
unilateral attempt to impose a settlement.”
Mr Bush’s endorsement
of Sharon’s plan enraged the Palestinians, the Arab world - and others.
The UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan also criticised the West Bank part
of the plan.
President Bush’s
statements, and an exchange of letters with Sharon in the same vein,
were likely to go down well with conservative supporters of Israel, and
Jewish voters in the US presidential election in November. But they
could also harm US interests in the Arab world and hurt efforts to
stabilize Iraq.
Opinion polls in
Israel have shown strong support for a move out of the Gaza Strip, but
settlers and right-wingers, including many in Sharon’s own Lukid party,
are opposed to any withdrawal.
This would be the
first time Israel has ever uprooted settlements in Gaza and the West
Bank - areas it captured during the 1967 Mideast war.
To gain the political
backing of his party, Sharon put the disengagement plan to a vote
amongst the 193,000 members of Likud on May 2. But . . .
SHARON LOSES referendum
ARIEL Sharon has
said, in the absence of other peace moves, his plan to evacuate Gaza’s
21 settlements and four small West Bank settlements was vital in
reducing the ongoing violence with the Palestinians, and defusing
international pressure on Israel. But in a stinging blow, a majority of
the Likud, rejected his controversial plan.
Supporters of the
“disengagement plan” argued that the violence underscored the hopeless
burden of staying in Gaza. Opponents said any withdrawal would be seen
as a reward for terror and encourage more attacks on Israelis.
Earlier Sharon said
that he would consider the referendum a vote of confidence in his
leadership, and that the vote among the 193,000 Likud members would be
binding. But in recent days he backed away from that position.
The result has left
the future of the “unilateral disengagement” in doubt, and his
leadership in disarray. It could lead to a major political crisis — a
Cabinet reshuffle, a split within the party, or early elections.
Likud members make up
only 4% of the Israeli electorate, and as less than 50% of them turned
out to vote, Sharon is not going to allow a 2% minority of the
electorate to decide Israel’s future.
SHOCKING RETALIATION ATTACK
ISRAEL was on high
security alert ahead of the referendum, dividing Gaza into three
sections and restricting Palestinian travel. That did not prevent the
deadliest attack in two years on Gaza settlers.
Tali Hatuel, 34 - who
was eight months pregnant - and her four daughters, ages 2 to 11, were
driving into Israel when gunmen fired on their station wagon. The car
spun off the road and the attackers charged it, shooting the five inside
at close range. Soldiers killed the attackers in a gun battle at the
scene.
The militant Islamic
Jihad and Popular Resistance Committees, an umbrella group, claimed
responsibility for what it called the “heroic” attack. They said it was
retaliation for Israel’s recent assassinations of Hamas founder, Sheik
Ahmed Yassin, and his successor, Abdel Aziz Rantisi. Hours later,
Israeli helicopters fired four missiles at the 14-storey building
housing a Hamas radio station in Gaza, lightly injuring seven
Palestinians.
Another air strike,
in Nablus, killed four Palestinian militants in a car, including two
leaders of a group with ties to Yasser Arafat’s Fatah movement. Israel
said they were responsible for several terror attacks.
SHARON WILL PUSH AHEAD
Ariel Sharon says he
will consult with Likud and government officials on his next steps, and
that he will make some changes to the plan, and present it directly to
the Knesset.
According to a poll,
the majority of Israelis would support the plan. And Opposition leader,
Shimon Peres, has advised the Prime Minister not to scale back on the
plan for Gaza and the West Bank in an effort to salvage it.
A political analyst
said; “There will be a certain government crisis for a few weeks, but
the basic plan will continue and Sharon will find alternative routes to
try to get it across.”
THE QUARTET URGES WITHDRAWAL
WITH their hopes
shattered by recent events, the Quartet, (the EU, the US, the UN and
Russia) - the sponsors of the “Road map” - met on May 4, 04, in New
York, seeking to pursue the “peace process.”
The Quartet’s
mediators urged Ariel Sharon to stick to his plan, calling it a “rare
moment of opportunity” for regional peace. But in a statement after the
meeting, the mediators emphasised the Israeli pullout plan “must lead to
a full Israeli withdrawal and complete end of occupation in Gaza.”
The mediators also
said that the pullout should not prejudge a final settlement, despite
President Bush’s assurance to Israel that it would not be expected to
give up all its West Bank settlements or accept the return of
Palestinian refugees to what is now the Jewish state.
ARABS OPPOSED TO UNILATERAL WITHDRAWAL
APRIL 22. The
Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) issued a declaration
denouncing Israel’s plan to unilaterally withdraw from the Gaza Strip
and parts of the West Bank, saying it violates the
internationally-brokered “Road Map for Peace.”
The “Road Map,” which
was supposed to establish a Palestinian State living in peace with
Israel before the end of 2005, has been a disaster, primarily because
the Palestinian Authority has been unwilling to rein in the terrorist
organisations. And the reason for that is because the extremist
organisations are unwilling to live alongside a Jewish state.
Sharon now says the
Road Map is dead! And in fact, Israel’s unilateral decision to withdraw
from Gaza and parts of the West Bank, bypasses the Road Map.
Ariel Sharon’s plan,
however, will not solve the issues; but it will be a calculated,
temporary measure, to contain the relentless attacks on Israel.
Since Sept 2001,
there have been more than
20,500
attacks in
Israel. 931 Israelis have been killed, and 6,232 wounded - up to March
2004.
But during the past 7
months, security forces prevented over 70 suicide bombing attacks in
Judea, Samaria & Gaza. In addition, during the same time period, at
least 35 shooting attacks were thwarted in Gaza alone.
The tragic prospect
is that ...
ISRAELIS MAY SOON HAVE A FULL-FLEDGED
PALESTINIAN TERROR STATE ON THEIR BORDER
WITHIN hours of Ariel
Sharon revealing his intention to withdraw from the Gaza Strip, Hamas,
the Palestinian Islamic Jihad and Yasser Arafat’s Fatah faction of the
PLO came together in Gaza City.
Throwing off the
differences that have divided them, the three organizations openly
discussed merging into a single leadership movement to control the Strip
when Israel leaves. How much of his power Yasser Arafat is willing to
give up to the others remains to be seen.
An agreement between
the terror groups would see the US-backed Palestinian Authority (which
is under Fatah’s control) linked to the other two groups that are at the
very top of the State Department’s list of terrorist organizations.
r r
r r
r
AFRICA
SUDAN SLAVE ‘CRUCIFIED’
AFTER being nailed to
a board by his master and left for dead, a Sudanese Dinka boy was
rescued, and escaped from his bondage and lived to tell his horrific
story.
The story of
“Joseph,” a Christian, is told in a recent newsletter of the
Persecution Project Foundation, an organization that monitors
Christian persecution in Africa.
PPF’s Brad Phillips
recently returned from visiting Joseph, who originally was sold into
slavery at age 7 in 1987. “I had the privilege of spending a day with
this amazing boy who is now called Joseph,” Phillips wrote. “I spoke
with him, I interviewed him, I saw his scars, and I saw his eyes. What I
saw moved me, and it still haunts me.”
Phillips explains
that since the 1980s, the Muslim National Islamic Front government has
sanctioned the taking of Christians and animists from the south part of
the nation to be sold to Muslims as slaves in the north. The two sides
have been engaged in a civil war for several years.
As a 7-year-old,
Joseph, was sold to his master, Ibrahim. Though Joseph was given an Arab
name, Ibrahim referred to him only by the pejorative “Abid,” which means
black slave. For ten years, Joseph remained in bondage to his master.
“During his
enslavement,” Phillips wrote, “he was often beaten, tortured and abused
by his Arab master. African slaves, especially Christians, are viewed as
lower than animals.
“Joseph was raised
Christian. His desire to worship was mocked by his master, who told him
every day for 10 years that he had no business worshipping since he was
of no more value than a donkey.”
One Sunday morning,
Joseph heard the hymn singing of a Christian service. He joined into the
worship, remembering church services from when he was a young boy.
While Joseph was at
church, some of the camels he was in charge of escaped, and his master
flew into a rage. Ibrahim swore he would kill Joseph and do to him what
had been done to Jesus ... he would crucify him.
After brutally
beating Joseph on the head and all over his body, the master laid him
out on a wooden plank. He then nailed Joseph to the plank by driving
nine-inch nails through his hands, knees and feet. He then poured acid
on Joseph’s legs to inflict even greater pain, and finally left him for
dead.”
Miraculously, Joseph
did not die, even though he lay on the plank for seven days. He survived
through the kindness of his master’s son, who brought him food and
water, and eventually took him to a medical facility.
“In case you are
wondering,” wrote Phillips, “no criminal charges were brought against
Joseph’s master, because he acted within his ‘rights’ under currently
practiced ‘sharia law.’ To say that Christians are second-class citizens
in much of the Islamic world (not just the Sudan) is a cruel
understatement.”
After Joseph returned
from the hospital, his master saw little value in him since he was
crippled from the nails being driven through his knees. Joseph was
“redeemed” by Christian slave redeemers who arranged his return home to
his village in Bahr el Gazal.
When he arrived back
in his home village, the elders thought he should have a new name, so
they named him after Joseph of the Bible, who was sold into slavery but
later was used mightily by God.
“Joseph still
desperately needs your prayers,” writes Brad Phillips. “By God’s grace
Joseph survived kidnapping, the loss of his parents, ten years of
enslavement, and near death by crucifixion. But while Joseph is free in
body, he is still in great pain physically and emotionally. He bears the
marks of his crucifixion in his body and the scars of his torment in his
soul. He is wounded and broken in his spirit. And he is haunted by the
memories of hundreds of other children from his community who perished
or remain enslaved.
“Joseph is one of a
small number of people in the 21st century who knows what it means to be
crucified because of his Christian faith. But the reality is that
hundreds of thousands of our fellow Christians in the Sudan have been
enslaved, driven from their homes, hunted and murdered by devoted
followers of Islam.”
This war of Islamic
cruelty has raged for
centuries
in the
Sudan. Please remember our Sudanese brethren in your prayers, and do all
you can to aid us in the relief of their suffering.”
-
PPF / WorldNetDaily.com / April 04
“CHILUBA DIDN’T MAKE ZAMBIA A CHRISTIAN NATION”
ONE African nation
where there is some good news - where national leaders acknowledge God
and are committed to the Bible, is Zambia.
Vice-President Nevers
Mumba has told his people, “Zambia is not a Christian nation because of
President Chiluba’s declaration.
“Without the Bible,”
Mumba said, “the country’s cherished status as a Christian nation will
be meaningless.”
The Vice-President
said there was nothing as powerful as the Word of God because it never
fails. “Kingdoms, political parties and presidents come and go, but the
one who heeds the will of the Father abides forever. The Bible was
God’s wisdom relevant to people’s lives.”
Mumba said Zambia’s
problems are many, but answers do not lie in the eloquence of leaders,
but depend on how people respect the Word of God. Even the fight against
corruption would not be won because of good people in the Task Force.
Corruption would be won if the nation subjected itself to translating
the power of God.
He warned that if the
Word of God was not widely spread, prisons would be full of people
caught committing crime. “If we can spread the Word of God in Zambia, we
will be putting the greatest treasure in the restoration and healing of
our society,” he said.
-
http://www.allafrica.com
“Blessed is
the nation whose God is YHWH, and the people He chose for His own
inheritance.”
(Psalm 33:12)
r r
r r
r
